Chapter VI — OF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
ধারা ৯৫Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
95. When language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts, evidence may be given to show that it was used in a peculiar sense.
Illustrations
A sells to B, by deed "my house in 2[Dhaka]".
A had no house in 3[Dhaka], but it appears that he had a house at 4[Narayanganj], of which B had been in possession since the execution of the deed.
These facts may be proved to show that the deed related to the house at 5[Narayanganj].
- Throughout this Act, except otherwise provided, the words "Bangladesh", "Government" and "Taka" were substituted, for the words "Pakistan", "Central Government" and "rupees" or "Rs." respectively by section 3 and 2nd Schedule of the Bangladesh Laws (Revision And Declaration) Act, 1973 (Act No. VIII of 1973).
- The word "Dhaka" was substituted, for the word "Karachi" by section 3 and 2nd Schedule of the Bangladesh Laws (Revision And Declaration) Act, 1973 (Act No. VIII of 1973).
- The word "Dhaka" was substituted, for the word "Karachi" by section 3 and 2nd Schedule of the Bangladesh Laws (Revision And Declaration) Act, 1973 (Act No. VIII of 1973).
- The word "Narayanganj" was substituted, for the word "Keamari" by section 3 and 2nd Schedule of the Bangladesh Laws (Revision And Declaration) Act, 1973 (Act No. VIII of 1973).
- The word "Narayanganj" was substituted, for the word "Keamari" by section 3 and 2nd Schedule of the Bangladesh Laws (Revision And Declaration) Act, 1973 (Act No. VIII of 1973).